Page 1 of 1

Votes v Sydney

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 5:06 pm
by robbie67
5. Welsh
4. Hislop
3. McVeigh
2. Reimers
1. Stanton

Unlucky: Those of us that watched it.

Re: Votes v Sydney

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 5:10 pm
by paddyl90
robbie67 wrote:
Unlucky: Those of us that watched it.
:lol: Made me feel extremely tired it did.

5.Hislop
4.Welsh
3.Stanton
2.McVeigh
1.Hille

Re: Votes v Sydney

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 5:41 pm
by jimmyc1985
3. Welsh
2. McVeigh
1. Hislop

Re: Votes v Sydney

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 6:26 pm
by bombercol
5- Hislop
4- Welsh
3 - Monfries
2 - Reimers
1 - Hille

Must persist with Neagle and Daniher, showed some bits that were good.

Lonergan was very good.

Re: Votes v Sydney

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 7:07 pm
by BenDoolan
5. Mark McVeigh
4. Andrew Welsh
3. Kyle Reimers
2. Tom Hislop
1. David Hille

2 players with < 15 games experience getting into the votes. Some of those in the 50 - 100+ game bracket need a rocket up the arse.

Re: Votes v Sydney

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 7:13 pm
by billyduckworth
3. Reimers (like this boy)
2. Hislop (ditto)
1. Monfries (despite the massive clanger count in the first half)

Others that were okay - Welsh, McVeigh.
Those who were ordinary - LOTS!

Re: Votes v Sydney

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 7:35 pm
by spikefan
5/ McVeigh
4/ Welsh
3/ Hislop
2/ Reimers
1/ Stanton

Re: Votes v Sydney

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 7:44 pm
by robrulz5
3. Welsh
2. Hislop
1. McVeigh

Re: Votes v Sydney

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 11:01 pm
by bomberdonnie
3. Welsh
2. Reimers
1. Hislop

I am perplexed as to how people think that Monfries deserves votes... Each to their own I guess

Re: Votes v Sydney

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:45 pm
by j-mac31
3. McVeigh
2. Hislop
1. Reimers