Page 1 of 2

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:43 pm
by merc_2
We are F****ED!

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:44 pm
by Madden
f*** me.

Lonergan and Paddy are massive outs.

f*** me.

Please tell me that c*** Bateman got weeks.

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:48 pm
by Scott
Just on SEN....TBC

LLoyd - 4 weeks offer from MRP...guilty 3 Probably what we all thought, the rule is wrong but....not much we can do about it.There's no chance of getting this less is there?

Ryder - 1 week I'd try everything possible to get him off.

Atkinson - Thrown out

Lonergan - 1 week Same as Paddy.

Lonergan and Paddy provoked and hit by Hodge first and retaliated.

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:52 pm
by damo22
lloydy should plead guilty and get three..
then he'll be back for the grannie :P

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:05 pm
by Lloyd is King
Lloyd, 3 weeks is fine. I was expecting 7-10 the way some d***heads were carrying on.

Lonergan's one sucks. Dunno what the deal is there.

But they should DEFINITELY fight Ryder's on the basis that force was too minimal to constitute a strike. Also he hits him in the neck just below the jaw if you look closely.

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:07 pm
by BenDoolan
I am assuming there are Hawthorn players amongst the citations? If not, why not?

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:30 pm
by gringo
Surely they can get Ryder off? What was he supposed to do when Hodge was punching him? And it was only a love tap. It'll get thrown out.

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:43 pm
by Scott
Who did Lonergan whack?

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:46 pm
by dom_105
Must challenge the Ryder one, for sure.

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:55 pm
by GoalSneak
Scott wrote:Who did Lonergan whack?
Hodge. Hodge hit him as he was running past so he turned around and hit him back.

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:01 pm
by Megan
Read that five Essendon players were also up on melee charges - can't seem to read anywhere that any Hawks players are cited for ANYTHING. We can't fight with ourselves, so surely they should be up on melee charges too???? Media seem focussed on Essendons charges.

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:04 pm
by ealesy
I heard Bateman can accept a reprimand for his clothesline on Lloyd.

Absolute joke if true, left his feet, had no other intention other than to try and cave Lloyd's face in, just lucky for the gimp, he's a soft pathetic princess and Lloydy just shook the hit off.

That is the sort of thing you want to see taken out of the game.

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:06 pm
by Mrs Mercuri
dom_105 wrote:Must challenge the Ryder one, for sure.
Yep might as well... im not overly confident that we will get him off though, yes Hodge started it but Paddy did punch Hodge with a clenched fist. Im not sure what the Lonergan one was for and with his good record maybe we can get him off.

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:10 pm
by dom_105
Plead provocation.

It worked for Des Headland

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:14 pm
by Jazz_84
Buddy's elbow = 1 week (with early guilty plea)

Paddy's hit (that wouldn't have even popped a pimple) = 1 week

i don't think anyone can justify that.....

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:18 pm
by Ossie
Megan wrote:Read that five Essendon players were also up on melee charges - can't seem to read anywhere that any Hawks players are cited for ANYTHING. We can't fight with ourselves, so surely they should be up on melee charges too???? Media seem focussed on Essendons charges.
The full MRP report hasn't come through yet. Due before 6pm.

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:40 pm
by robbie67
Dont mind about Lloyd. He did what he had to. If he plans on playing on, take the four weeks, so you dont get six. If retiring, appeal, it cant hurt.

Ryder will have to cop the week, amazed that Hodge gets away with it. Maybe it's worth appealing, because even if he loses, we will probably have Hille back anyway for the start of 2010. Not playing this week, just gives us even less of a chance. The Lonergan one is joke, and he should definately appeal, he will get off.

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:48 pm
by Jazz_84
id cop the 4 weeks sweet if all was fair! but Buddy gets 1 and bateman gets 1 also.... both far more worse IMO just hard to deal with when others get off so much better.

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:51 pm
by rockhole
I cannot believe that Hodge did not get done for two incidents. The first was a forearm to Paddy's head to which he retaliated with the softest "pop" I have ever seen. We must challenge that one.

The second one takes a bit of careful scrutiny of the replay, but clearly shows Hodge hitting Sammy who retaliated with a beautiful left which really stunned the prick and stopped him dead in his tracks. Expected to get a least one for that, but once again, Hodge was the instigator and appears too have gotten off scot free.

And as for that little germ Bateman, who left the ground to hit Lloydy with a coat hanger, one week. You have to be joking!!! [-X [-X

Re: 4 weeks?

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:34 pm
by BenDoolan
Members of the MRP need to open the other eye.....

And Bateman getting one week. Get Fcked. Have a look at his reaction after he collected him. He meant it.