Page 1 of 1

Votes v Sainters

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 7:27 pm
by F111
I wasn't there, but am keen to know our best?

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 7:34 pm
by robbie67
5. Hille
4. Fletcher
3. Davey
2. Melksham
1. Hocking

Ryder, McVeigh, Atkinson, Winderlich, Gumbleton, Dempsey, and Prismall also good.

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 8:05 pm
by Doctor Fish
5. Hille
4. Fletch
3. Hocko
2. Demps
1. Milkshake
=1. Dawson

Great team effort for the entire game. Well coached Knighta. Hat's off people...

=D>

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 8:07 pm
by Mrs Mercuri
from the parts of the game i heard...

5- Hocking
4- Hille
3- Davey
2- Fletch
1- Watson

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 10:27 pm
by Royza
5 Hocking (23 poss at 74% & 8 contested. 8 tackles, 8 marks, 1 goal) - consistent throughout the game, all aspects of his game (marking, kicking, decisions..) were solid.
4 Hille (15 poss at 60% & 7 CP. 5 marks, 4 goals.) - for kicking the crucial goals.
3 Fletch (22 poss at 82% & 3 CP. 9 marks, 12 1%ers) - usual game high 1%ers and another top game. Only struggled when he got blocked by a 2nd StK player.
2 Dempsey (18 poss at 89% & 11 CP. 3 marks, 4 tackles, 6 1%ers) - good game. One of his best decision making games combined with his usual quick skills.
1 Watson (25 poss at 64% & 10 CP. 5 marks, 5 tackles, 7 clearances) - equal game high in clearances (with Dal Santo/Goddard) and 4 above anyone else in our team. Disposal efficiency not flattering, but had some good contested possessions.

Other mentions:

Davey (16 poss at 94% & 5 CP. 7 tackles) - hopefully the end of the fumbles.
Melksham - looks comfortable at AFL level & looks a smart player.
Gumbleton - Wasn't a great game, but I liked how he ran to make an option from the kick ins & rebound in the last qtr when StK were pressing. Actually ran ok all game.
Ryder - (16 poss at 69% & 9 CP. 21 HO, 5 marks, 3 goals) - Did OK for hit outs and CP. His tackle count is much lower this season & still has room for improvement around the ground.
Myers - (19 poss at 74% & 2 CP. 6 marks, 3 tackles) - Started badly, but to his credit ended up with a reasonable game.
Atkinson - went on a few good runs and didn't get tackled!
Spike - played a good team role shutting down Milne - (Milne 12 poss at %33)

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 10:40 pm
by 84859300
5. Hocking
4. Davey
3. Hille
2. Melksham
1. Ryder

Prismal needs a long spell in the twos.

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 10:44 pm
by robrulz5
5- Hille
4- Fletcher
3- Watson
2- Davey
1- Melshkam

Prismall was horrible again.

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 12:58 am
by Windy_Hill
robrulz5 wrote: Prismall was horrible again.

Prismalls stats - they are not so bad?

D EFF% K H G B CM UM T CL C SC
16 75 13 3 0 0 0 6 3 3 0 67

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 6:56 am
by ace076
5. Hille
4. Hocking
3. Fletcher
2. Watson
1. Davey

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:21 am
by Madden
Prismall simply doesn't put his head over it since he got clobbered in Round 1. Its a mental thing, but he needs to get over it. I'd drop him next week if it were up to me.

5. Hocking
4. Hille
3. Fletcher
2. Ryder
1. Watson

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 11:26 am
by GoalSneak
5. Fletcher
4. Hocking
3. Hille
2. Watson
1. Davey

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 12:03 pm
by Ossie
3. Fletcher
2. Hocko
1. Hille

Honourable mentions to Paddy, Watson, Melksham.

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 4:27 pm
by j-mac31
3. Fletcher
2. Hocking
1. Hille

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 6:43 pm
by billyduckworth
5. Hille
4. Ryder
3. Fletcher
2. Hocking
1. Davey

Also worth a mention...Melksham (coming along nicely this boy), Watson, Monfries

Re: Votes v Sainters

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:35 pm
by bueller
5. Hille
4. Hocking
3. Fletch
2. Watson
1. Davey