Votes vs. Maggots

Talk about everything Essendon. Past, Present and Future if it's about the Bombers this is the place to be.
Post Reply
User avatar
boncer34
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 10184
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:14 pm

Votes vs. Maggots

Post by boncer34 »

5. Hocking
4. Jetta
3. Watson
2. Prismall
1. Ryder
Essendon Football Club- We arent arrogant, just deluded.
User avatar
Ossie
Club Captain
Posts: 3873
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: North Kilt-town

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by Ossie »

5. Watson
4. Prismall
3. Lovett-Murray
2. Ryder
1. McVeigh
You couldn't fool your own mother on the foolingest day of your life with an electrified fooling machine.
User avatar
nomolos
Club Captain
Posts: 2930
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:51 pm

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by nomolos »

3 Hocking
2 Zaharakis
1 Watson

I dunno i just sort of guessed cept to say Ryder did nothing and our talls got raped by their talls.
User avatar
boncer34
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 10184
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:14 pm

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by boncer34 »

nomolos wrote:
I dunno i just sort of guessed cept to say Ryder did nothing and our talls got raped by their talls.
Dont get caught up in the Mumford hype like the idiot commentators. Ryder played all day by himself basically in the pouring rain in the ruck. Mumford had 5 spells in the last quarter, what a hero.
Essendon Football Club- We arent arrogant, just deluded.
User avatar
robrulz5
Essendon Legend
Posts: 20398
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by robrulz5 »

5. Hocking
4. Watson
3. Welsh
2. Lovett-Murray
1. Jetta
User avatar
Royza
Club Captain
Posts: 2797
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:58 pm

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by Royza »

5. Hocking
4. Jetta
3. McVeigh
2. Welsh
1. Winderlich

Tough to give votes in those conditions and after a loss :evil:

Got killed in the centre of the ground (56-30 clearances and 64-38 hitouts) courtesy of JMcV (14 clearances) and JBolton (11 clearances) with Mumford controlling the ruck with 46 hitouts.

Thought Dempsey had a shocker (6 clangers) even with that BS free against him.
User avatar
BenDoolan
Essendon Legend
Posts: 29806
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:10 pm

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by BenDoolan »

5. Heath Hocking
4. Leroy Jetta
3. Mark McVeigh
2. Jobe Watson
1. Brent Prismall


Great effort Dons - very stiff. Maybe one ******* day this decade we may get to play those arseholes in Melbourne. But don't hold your breath :evil:
Essendunny
Image
bomberflyer
Top Up Player
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 1:55 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by bomberflyer »

1) Hocking
2) Jetta
3) Hurley
4) McVeigh
5) Dempsey
No.1 Fan of Alwyn and his Band of Brothers.

2008 Mission: Operation Aaron Davey
User avatar
ealesy
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 5580
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:19 pm

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by ealesy »

boncer34 wrote:
nomolos wrote:
I dunno i just sort of guessed cept to say Ryder did nothing and our talls got raped by their talls.
Dont get caught up in the Mumford hype like the idiot commentators. Ryder played all day by himself basically in the pouring rain in the ruck. Mumford had 5 spells in the last quarter, what a hero.
Far superior ruckman than the bloke at Geelong that for some f****** reason they chose to keep over him for some reason. Seriously should've played in the Grand Final last year over Blake and they should've kept him on their list over Spud Blake.

Now seriously if Ryder does not give Blake a spanking next week he has something to answer for.
User avatar
Doctor Fish
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 1449
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:30 am

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by Doctor Fish »

ealesy wrote:
boncer34 wrote:
nomolos wrote:
I dunno i just sort of guessed cept to say Ryder did nothing and our talls got raped by their talls.
Dont get caught up in the Mumford hype like the idiot commentators. Ryder played all day by himself basically in the pouring rain in the ruck. Mumford had 5 spells in the last quarter, what a hero.
Far superior ruckman than the bloke at Geelong that for some f****** reason they chose to keep over him for some reason. Seriously should've played in the Grand Final last year over Blake and they should've kept him on their list over Spud Blake.

Now seriously if Ryder does not give Blake a spanking next week he has something to answer for.
He's only as good as his midfielders and if they turn up like today we're gone...

54321
Good effort Dons. No chocakajtex....
User avatar
Windy_Hill
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 12859
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by Windy_Hill »

didnt see the game but very pleased to see the gang giving votes to Hocking, Jetta and Prismall, all of whom seem to be really making a difference at the moment after a slow start to the season.

These are all games in the bank for these boys and they inch closer to Saladin's magic 50 game milestone
User avatar
Doctor Fish
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 1449
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:30 am

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by Doctor Fish »

Doctor Fish wrote:
ealesy wrote:
Far superior ruckman than the bloke at Geelong that for some f****** reason they chose to keep over him for some reason. Seriously should've played in the Grand Final last year over Blake and they should've kept him on their list over Spud Blake.

Now seriously if Ryder does not give Blake a spanking next week he has something to answer for.
He's only as good as his midfielders and if they turn up like today we're gone...

54321
Good effort Dons. No chocakajtex....[/quote]

Sorry. Had a few.

%.Hocko
$. Jobe
#. Whatever BD picked....
User avatar
robbie67
Essendon Legend
Posts: 16114
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:00 pm

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by robbie67 »

5. Hocking
4. McVeigh
3. Jetta
2. NLM
1. Ryder
User avatar
bueller
High Draft Pick
Posts: 631
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:17 pm

Re: Votes vs. Maggots

Post by bueller »

5. hocking
4. Jetta
3. Davey
2. Watson
1. Welsh
"your'e like a girl standing out the front of a chemist…..Too scared to go in and get the pill!"
Post Reply