Paul Keating on Lateline
Paul Keating on Lateline
As Tony Jones put it....I think he's set the cat among the pigeons.
He certainly didn't do the ALP any favours tonight. Virtually said that dear Julia doesn't get it as far as IR is concerned and that Rudd, just like Beasley before him is getting very poor advice on how to counter the Libs attack on Labor's credentials re the economy.
Also paid out on Costello saying that HE is the P Plate driver and that the reforms that the Hawke/Keating governments introduced are the basic reasons why the economy is running so well now.
All well and good Paul but I reckon we will find his comments on Labor will be the ones that make the headlines.
He certainly didn't do the ALP any favours tonight. Virtually said that dear Julia doesn't get it as far as IR is concerned and that Rudd, just like Beasley before him is getting very poor advice on how to counter the Libs attack on Labor's credentials re the economy.
Also paid out on Costello saying that HE is the P Plate driver and that the reforms that the Hawke/Keating governments introduced are the basic reasons why the economy is running so well now.
All well and good Paul but I reckon we will find his comments on Labor will be the ones that make the headlines.
Politicians get a massive super payout far greater than the average Australian worker. Why cant they just f*** off when sacked and live a life of anonymity? I mean fair dinkum, who gives a crap about a guy who hasn't been in power for over 10 years. Every year, an ex-politician has his 2-bob worth that means even less than that.
You had your chance, you blew it, move on.
You had your chance, you blew it, move on.
- jimmyc1985
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 5869
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:33 pm
- Location: Position A
My sentiments are along similar lines. He needn't make any comment. Even if his intent is to support his own party, i still don't see the need for him to volunteer his opinion at every opportunity. Silly old bovver boy should just keep his thoughts to himself.Rossoneri wrote:Politicians get a massive super payout far greater than the average Australian worker. Why cant they just f*** off when sacked and live a life of anonymity? I mean fair dinkum, who gives a crap about a guy who hasn't been in power for over 10 years. Every year, an ex-politician has his 2-bob worth that means even less than that.
You had your chance, you blew it, move on.
As for the public sector superannuation policies though, i don't really object to them getting these seemingly exorbitant sums. The reason public servants get these large entitlements after retiring is because (generally speaking) their remuneration whilst working is far inferior to those in the private sector. There has to be some carrot dangled out there to attract people to work in the public sector.
$160k per year tax free, plus having most expenses paid for by the tax payer including petrol.jimmyc1985 wrote: As for the public sector superannuation policies though, i don't really object to them getting these seemingly exorbitant sums. The reason public servants get these large entitlements after retiring is because (generally speaking) their remuneration whilst working is far inferior to those in the private sector. There has to be some carrot dangled out there to attract people to work in the public sector.
Geez, how do they survive?
- jimmyc1985
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 5869
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:33 pm
- Location: Position A
You missed the point completely.Rossoneri wrote:$160k per year tax free, plus having most expenses paid for by the tax payer including petrol.jimmyc1985 wrote: As for the public sector superannuation policies though, i don't really object to them getting these seemingly exorbitant sums. The reason public servants get these large entitlements after retiring is because (generally speaking) their remuneration whilst working is far inferior to those in the private sector. There has to be some carrot dangled out there to attract people to work in the public sector.
Geez, how do they survive?
Take judges for example. I think the judges on the High Court get about $350k p.a. If they stayed in private practice as barristers most of them could probably earn close to a million bucks per year, charging close to $10k per day.
I'm not saying that public sector payouts aren't large - i'm saying that they're needed to provide some incentive for talented people to work in the public sector as an offset to the likely loss in income that is suffered when people take a job in the public sector over the private sector.
I was talking about politicians, specifically.jimmyc1985 wrote:You missed the point completely.Rossoneri wrote:$160k per year tax free, plus having most expenses paid for by the tax payer including petrol.jimmyc1985 wrote: As for the public sector superannuation policies though, i don't really object to them getting these seemingly exorbitant sums. The reason public servants get these large entitlements after retiring is because (generally speaking) their remuneration whilst working is far inferior to those in the private sector. There has to be some carrot dangled out there to attract people to work in the public sector.
Geez, how do they survive?
Take judges for example. I think the judges on the High Court get about $350k p.a. If they stayed in private practice as barristers most of them could probably earn close to a million bucks per year, charging close to $10k per day.
I'm not saying that public sector payouts aren't large - i'm saying that they're needed to provide some incentive for talented people to work in the public sector as an offset to the likely loss in income that is suffered when people take a job in the public sector over the private sector.
Sorry.
- jimmyc1985
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 5869
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:33 pm
- Location: Position A
I would admit that the carrot of high superannuation and pension payouts hasn't necessarily worked to attract high quality politiciansRossoneri wrote:I was talking about politicians, specifically.
Sorry.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Its one of the few professions where you dont need a degree to get into.jimmyc1985 wrote:I would admit that the carrot of high superannuation and pension payouts hasn't necessarily worked to attract high quality politiciansRossoneri wrote:I was talking about politicians, specifically.
Sorry.. I get the feeling that some politicians would have a snowball's chance in hell of earning as much in the private sector as they do being a politician
.
Paul Keating left high school when he was 15.
Probably goes to show that they dont teach bullshit in high schools.
Nope, they teach that at LaTrobe.Rossoneri wrote:Its one of the few professions where you dont need a degree to get into.jimmyc1985 wrote:I would admit that the carrot of high superannuation and pension payouts hasn't necessarily worked to attract high quality politiciansRossoneri wrote:I was talking about politicians, specifically.
Sorry.. I get the feeling that some politicians would have a snowball's chance in hell of earning as much in the private sector as they do being a politician
.
Paul Keating left high school when he was 15.
Probably goes to show that they dont teach bullshit in high schools.
- bomberdonnie
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 8575
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:25 pm
- Location: Old Hobart Town
Also shows that you dont have to have a degree to do well in life (although it does help!!) or be intellectual.Rossoneri wrote:Its one of the few professions where you dont need a degree to get into.jimmyc1985 wrote:I would admit that the carrot of high superannuation and pension payouts hasn't necessarily worked to attract high quality politiciansRossoneri wrote:I was talking about politicians, specifically.
Sorry.. I get the feeling that some politicians would have a snowball's chance in hell of earning as much in the private sector as they do being a politician
.
Paul Keating left high school when he was 15.
Probably goes to show that they dont teach bullshit in high schools.
In his day Keating was way too smart for any of the fvckwits on the other side of the table, he made them look stupid on a regular basis...
I agree though... PK needs to have a coke, smile and shut the **** up!!
Predictable, at best.Staggy wrote:Nope, they teach that at LaTrobe.Rossoneri wrote:Its one of the few professions where you dont need a degree to get into.jimmyc1985 wrote:I would admit that the carrot of high superannuation and pension payouts hasn't necessarily worked to attract high quality politiciansRossoneri wrote:I was talking about politicians, specifically.
Sorry.. I get the feeling that some politicians would have a snowball's chance in hell of earning as much in the private sector as they do being a politician
.
Paul Keating left high school when he was 15.
Probably goes to show that they dont teach bullshit in high schools.
They obviously need to add 'Sense of Humour 101' to the curriculum as well, it would seem...Rossoneri wrote:Predictable, at best.Staggy wrote:Nope, they teach that at LaTrobe.Rossoneri wrote:Its one of the few professions where you dont need a degree to get into.jimmyc1985 wrote:I would admit that the carrot of high superannuation and pension payouts hasn't necessarily worked to attract high quality politiciansRossoneri wrote:I was talking about politicians, specifically.
Sorry.. I get the feeling that some politicians would have a snowball's chance in hell of earning as much in the private sector as they do being a politician
.
Paul Keating left high school when he was 15.
Probably goes to show that they dont teach bullshit in high schools.
- The Man from Bomberland
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 10058
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:32 pm
- Location: Brisbane
I think he might be somewhere close to the mark in his comments about Rudd's advisers being focus group obsessed. Since Rudd has been leader he has been far more handled in terms of his media appearances whereas before, as shadow Foreign Affairs Minister, he was somewhat of a media tart to use a Peter Beattie's old saying.
He was having a go at the policy of being a small target when Beazley was leader which left the electorate the impression that the ALP had no policies. He wants the passion to come from Rudd and not be stymied by minders.
I personally think Rudd has struck the right balance but he needs to be careful of being too careful.
He was having a go at the policy of being a small target when Beazley was leader which left the electorate the impression that the ALP had no policies. He wants the passion to come from Rudd and not be stymied by minders.
I personally think Rudd has struck the right balance but he needs to be careful of being too careful.
![Image](https://resources.essendonfc.com.au/photo-resources/2023/06/12/a2e16807-e2a0-4d99-9250-d674e5286e11/04EsGW23DB4037.jpg?width=1536&height=956)
Menzie!!
Things go awry without Jye!!
Regards
MH_Bomber