To the 3 Judges of the Court of Appeal in this case;
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/convi ... ylu1u.html
You are a bunch of despicable c****. More despicable than the c*** who stomped on the child.
"The child cannot be named for legal reasons". I guess it is to protect her in death? Our justice system is f****** insane. Seriously sick.
Maggot Judges
Re: Maggot Judges
Essendunny
Re: Maggot Judges
Did you read the article.BenDoolan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:25 pm To the 3 Judges of the Court of Appeal in this case;
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/convi ... ylu1u.html
You are a bunch of despicable c****. More despicable than the c*** who stomped on the child.
"The child cannot be named for legal reasons". I guess it is to protect her in death? Our justice system is f****** insane. Seriously sick.
Re: Maggot Judges
YepSismis wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:56 pmDid you read the article.BenDoolan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:25 pm To the 3 Judges of the Court of Appeal in this case;
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/convi ... ylu1u.html
You are a bunch of despicable c****. More despicable than the c*** who stomped on the child.
"The child cannot be named for legal reasons". I guess it is to protect her in death? Our justice system is f****** insane. Seriously sick.
Essendunny
Re: Maggot Judges
And you didn't see anyone else who is protected by not naming the victim?BenDoolan wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:23 pmYepSismis wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:56 pmDid you read the article.BenDoolan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:25 pm To the 3 Judges of the Court of Appeal in this case;
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/convi ... ylu1u.html
You are a bunch of despicable c****. More despicable than the c*** who stomped on the child.
"The child cannot be named for legal reasons". I guess it is to protect her in death? Our justice system is f****** insane. Seriously sick.
Re: Maggot Judges
And you didn't see anyone else who is protected by not naming the victim?BenDoolan wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:23 pmYepSismis wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:56 pmDid you read the article.BenDoolan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:25 pm To the 3 Judges of the Court of Appeal in this case;
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/convi ... ylu1u.html
You are a bunch of despicable c****. More despicable than the c*** who stomped on the child.
"The child cannot be named for legal reasons". I guess it is to protect her in death? Our justice system is f****** insane. Seriously sick.
Re: Maggot Judges
Don't know, they didn't name that other person.Sismis wrote: ↑Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:11 amAnd you didn't see anyone else who is protected by not naming the victim?BenDoolan wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:23 pmYepSismis wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:56 pmDid you read the article.BenDoolan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:25 pm To the 3 Judges of the Court of Appeal in this case;
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/convi ... ylu1u.html
You are a bunch of despicable c****. More despicable than the c*** who stomped on the child.
"The child cannot be named for legal reasons". I guess it is to protect her in death? Our justice system is f****** insane. Seriously sick.
I find it interesting that in January this year, both the victim and the mother were named in an article following his conviction. The brother was not. Hence he is protected.
Essendunny