Votes V Adelaide
Votes V Adelaide
5. Welsh
4. Hocking
3. McPhee
2. Stanton
1. Dyson
4. Hocking
3. McPhee
2. Stanton
1. Dyson
Re: Votes V Adelaide
5.McPhee
4.Hurley
3.Pears
2.Dyson
1.Welsh
My votes went simply on effort.
4.Hurley
3.Pears
2.Dyson
1.Welsh
My votes went simply on effort.
- Mrs Mercuri
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 7035
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:12 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Votes V Adelaide
5- Fletcher
4- Welsh
3- Hocking
2- McPhee
1- Natrat
mentions to McVeigh, Dempsey and Hurley (for effort).
4- Welsh
3- Hocking
2- McPhee
1- Natrat
mentions to McVeigh, Dempsey and Hurley (for effort).
Re: Votes V Adelaide
Crickey, this aint easy....
5. Adam McPhee
4. Ricky Dyson
3. Heath Hocking
2. Brent Stanton
1. Mark McVeigh
5. Adam McPhee
4. Ricky Dyson
3. Heath Hocking
2. Brent Stanton
1. Mark McVeigh
Essendunny
- Windy_Hill
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 12859
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm
Re: Votes V Adelaide
I honestly cant say - no one stands out - maybe McPhee for his four goals - NLM for trying hard???
Am bitterly disappointed - expected a loss but not this.
Am bitterly disappointed - expected a loss but not this.
Re: Votes V Adelaide
5. McPhee
4. Stanton
3. Fletch
2. Hooker
1. Welsh
In terms of effort - NLM and Dyson worked hard all night. Hurley had few opportunities but used each of them.
Cheers - STI
4. Stanton
3. Fletch
2. Hooker
1. Welsh
In terms of effort - NLM and Dyson worked hard all night. Hurley had few opportunities but used each of them.
Cheers - STI
dices ad adepto futui (tell them to f*** off)
Re: Votes V Adelaide
Windy_Hill wrote:I honestly cant say - no one stands out - maybe McPhee for his four goals - NLM for trying hard???
Am bitterly disappointed - expected a loss but not this.
Come off it. They have been flogging teams with full lists to choose from for the past month. We were always going to get pasted. If they play Collingwood next week, they will kill them too.
Re: Votes V Adelaide
5 - NLM
4 - Hooker
3 - Fletch
2 - McPhee
1 - Hocking
4 - Hooker
3 - Fletch
2 - McPhee
1 - Hocking
My material isn't very good..Oh...and then there's the bladder problem.
Re: Votes V Adelaide
5. NLM
4. McPhee
3. Welsh
2. Hooker
1. Dyson
Special mention to Quinn for his efforts...he showed up a lot of more experienced players for desire and effort tonight
4. McPhee
3. Welsh
2. Hooker
1. Dyson
Special mention to Quinn for his efforts...he showed up a lot of more experienced players for desire and effort tonight
"You can quote me on this... He is gawn" - bomberdonnie re Hurley's contract status 25 February 2012
- tonysoprano
- Club Captain
- Posts: 4639
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 6:31 pm
- Location: Perth
Re: Votes V Adelaide
3. McPhee (4 goals out of 10 - good enough).
2. Hocking (tough, committed customer; and he was dropped during the season because....?)
1. Hooker (this kid looked really composed when he had the ball in close - his handballing actually hit team-mates unlike the rest of our rabble).
2. Hocking (tough, committed customer; and he was dropped during the season because....?)
1. Hooker (this kid looked really composed when he had the ball in close - his handballing actually hit team-mates unlike the rest of our rabble).
Re: Votes V Adelaide
5:hocking
4:McPhee
3:fletch
2:dempsey
1:Watson
4:McPhee
3:fletch
2:dempsey
1:Watson
Re: Votes V Adelaide
Have to question that one. He was totally blanketed tonight - had no effect.Brumaz wrote:5:hocking
4:McPhee
3:fletch
2:dempsey
1:Watson
Then again, neither did about 15 other blokes.....
Essendunny
Re: Votes V Adelaide
The fact that McPhee is getting votes shows how average we were tonight.
Yes he kicked 4 goals. 3 of them were gimmies. He cost us 6 goals (at least) which were caused directly from his turnovers, his dropped marks, his getting pinged for running 15 metres in a circle , or not going hard enough at contests.
Absolutely 100% must be traded while we can get something for him. His lack of skill (ordinary kick, ordinary mark) and his brain-dead decision making has cost us about 3 goals a game, every week, for about 5 years.
I'm sure some of you don't agree, and this was not intended to be a criticism of anyone who gave him votes (seriously). Sorry for the rant.
5. Hocking
4. Lovett-Murray
3. Welsh
2. Dyson
1. Fletcher
Yes he kicked 4 goals. 3 of them were gimmies. He cost us 6 goals (at least) which were caused directly from his turnovers, his dropped marks, his getting pinged for running 15 metres in a circle , or not going hard enough at contests.
Absolutely 100% must be traded while we can get something for him. His lack of skill (ordinary kick, ordinary mark) and his brain-dead decision making has cost us about 3 goals a game, every week, for about 5 years.
I'm sure some of you don't agree, and this was not intended to be a criticism of anyone who gave him votes (seriously). Sorry for the rant.
5. Hocking
4. Lovett-Murray
3. Welsh
2. Dyson
1. Fletcher
Re: Votes V Adelaide
5 Fletcher
4 NLM
3 Welsh
2 Hocking
1 Dempsey (for his first quarter particularly)
4 NLM
3 Welsh
2 Hocking
1 Dempsey (for his first quarter particularly)
Re: Votes V Adelaide
5. Hocking (18 poss & 5 contested at 89%, 4 tackles, 4 marks) - hard at it all night.
4. McPhee (13 poss & 5 contested at 77%, 3 tackles, 6 marks, 4 goals) - about the only player we had that looked dangerous even with the occasional stuff up.
3. Stanton (24 poss & 4 contested at 96%, 4 marks, 1 goal, 3 i50) - covered the ground well, ball use was pretty good by foot.
2. Welsh (23 poss & 4 contested at 61%, game high 11 tackles, 3 clearances, 4 marks, 3 i50) - worked hard to slow their midfield which was tough with the Ruck situation.
1. McVeigh (18 poss & 4 contested at 94%, 3 i50, 4 1%) - Put in a decent effort, good ball use especially by foot.
NLM (24 poss, 5 contested at 67%, 4 marks, 5 hitouts, 4 i50, 4 1%) - a lot of the ball, ran, & annoyed the shit out of the home crowd.
Fletch (15 poss, 7 contested at 93%, 5 marks, 5 1%) - rested at the end, usual good self. Battled hard against some pretty good power forwards & good movement by their mids.
Dyson (19 poss, 6 contested at 74%, 3 i50) - some good attacking run & kicks.
4. McPhee (13 poss & 5 contested at 77%, 3 tackles, 6 marks, 4 goals) - about the only player we had that looked dangerous even with the occasional stuff up.
3. Stanton (24 poss & 4 contested at 96%, 4 marks, 1 goal, 3 i50) - covered the ground well, ball use was pretty good by foot.
2. Welsh (23 poss & 4 contested at 61%, game high 11 tackles, 3 clearances, 4 marks, 3 i50) - worked hard to slow their midfield which was tough with the Ruck situation.
1. McVeigh (18 poss & 4 contested at 94%, 3 i50, 4 1%) - Put in a decent effort, good ball use especially by foot.
NLM (24 poss, 5 contested at 67%, 4 marks, 5 hitouts, 4 i50, 4 1%) - a lot of the ball, ran, & annoyed the shit out of the home crowd.
Fletch (15 poss, 7 contested at 93%, 5 marks, 5 1%) - rested at the end, usual good self. Battled hard against some pretty good power forwards & good movement by their mids.
Dyson (19 poss, 6 contested at 74%, 3 i50) - some good attacking run & kicks.
Re: Votes V Adelaide
5. NLM
4. Pears
3. Stanton
2. McVeigh
1. Dyson
4. Pears
3. Stanton
2. McVeigh
1. Dyson
Re: Votes V Adelaide
5. NLM
4. McPhee
3. Hocking
2. Pears
1. Welsh
4. McPhee
3. Hocking
2. Pears
1. Welsh
- Doctor Fish
- Regular Senior Player
- Posts: 1449
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:30 am
Re: Votes V Adelaide
5. Smoke
4. NLM
3. Stants
2. Woosha
1. ?
4. NLM
3. Stants
2. Woosha
1. ?
Re: Votes V Adelaide
5. NatRat
4. Pears
3. McPhee
2. Dyson
1. Hooker
4. Pears
3. McPhee
2. Dyson
1. Hooker
You couldn't fool your own mother on the foolingest day of your life with an electrified fooling machine.
- billyduckworth
- Club Captain
- Posts: 3044
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:16 am
- Location: Adelaide
Re: Votes V Adelaide
3. McPhee
2. Hocking
1. NLM
(Can't really say we had any "good" players, but these three at least had a dip,
as did Hooker, Fletch, Dyson, Hurley, Pears & Quinn.)
2. Hocking
1. NLM
(Can't really say we had any "good" players, but these three at least had a dip,
as did Hooker, Fletch, Dyson, Hurley, Pears & Quinn.)