Votes vs Scum
Votes vs Scum
This is hard ... and apols to many including Davey, Belly, and Watson 0 but I want to reward a few who did a job to perfection
5. Stants
4. Hooker
3. Hibberd
2. Crameri (2-3 gaols in semijunk time ... as a forward ... must learn to kick better )
1. Hocking ... shut down Judd brilliantly
5. Stants
4. Hooker
3. Hibberd
2. Crameri (2-3 gaols in semijunk time ... as a forward ... must learn to kick better )
1. Hocking ... shut down Judd brilliantly
dices ad adepto futui (tell them to f*** off)
Re: Votes vs Scum
I would like to see a whole match for the little refrigerator repair man! He looked like he could be a very tough little bugger, liked what I saw of him. Well done to him!
]
- Windy_Hill
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 12859
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm
Re: Votes vs Scum
Tough Call
5 - Stanton....surely leading the Brownlow count after 4 rounds - sorry for the americanism but quarterbacked the team beautifully today
4 - Crameri - should have kicked 8 goals, just fierce at the contest, is making up for Hurls' average form at the moment (and now injury absence)
3 - Hibberd - just quietly, his best game. Was disciplined and effective.
2 - Watson - normal excellent performance
1- Hocking - just a great game at closing down their midfield (ditto Sammy Lonergan)
Apologies to Belly, Fletcher, Heppel, Howlett, Davey and Dyson
edit note - sorry orignally mentioned Hardingham, actually meant Hibberd
5 - Stanton....surely leading the Brownlow count after 4 rounds - sorry for the americanism but quarterbacked the team beautifully today
4 - Crameri - should have kicked 8 goals, just fierce at the contest, is making up for Hurls' average form at the moment (and now injury absence)
3 - Hibberd - just quietly, his best game. Was disciplined and effective.
2 - Watson - normal excellent performance
1- Hocking - just a great game at closing down their midfield (ditto Sammy Lonergan)
Apologies to Belly, Fletcher, Heppel, Howlett, Davey and Dyson
edit note - sorry orignally mentioned Hardingham, actually meant Hibberd
Last edited by Windy_Hill on Sat Apr 21, 2012 4:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Votes vs Scum
5. Stanton
4. Belchambers
3. Heppell
2. Watson
1. Davey
Also good: Fletcher, Melksham, Pears, Hooker, Hocking, Ryder, Davey, Hibberd, Zaka, Crameri, Dyson.
4. Belchambers
3. Heppell
2. Watson
1. Davey
Also good: Fletcher, Melksham, Pears, Hooker, Hocking, Ryder, Davey, Hibberd, Zaka, Crameri, Dyson.
- Windy_Hill
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 12859
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm
Re: Votes vs Scum
robbie67 wrote:5. Stanton
4. Belchambers
3. Heppell
2. Watson
1. Davey
Also good: Fletcher, Melksham, Pears, Hooker, Hocking, Ryder, Davey, Hibberd, Zaka, Crameri, Dyson.
Hooker and Pears showing something - very pleased with that
- bomberdonnie
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 8575
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:25 pm
- Location: Old Hobart Town
Re: Votes vs Scum
5. Stanton
4. Crameri
3. Hibberd
2. Belly
1. Watson
That was f****** hard
4. Crameri
3. Hibberd
2. Belly
1. Watson
That was f****** hard
- tonysoprano
- Club Captain
- Posts: 4639
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 6:31 pm
- Location: Perth
Re: Votes vs Scum
5. Stants
4. TBC
3. Watson
2. Crameri (could have kicked 7.5 and might have been BOG)
1. Hibberd
4. TBC
3. Watson
2. Crameri (could have kicked 7.5 and might have been BOG)
1. Hibberd
Re: Votes vs Scum
5. Stanton
4. Watson
3. Crameri
2. Hocking
1. Hibberd
No passengers at all and I could have given votes to a number of others.
What I liked most was that Judd, Murphy, Kreuzer, Betts, Gartlett, Gibbs and Scotland were all largely ineffective which shows what a great shut down job was done.
4. Watson
3. Crameri
2. Hocking
1. Hibberd
No passengers at all and I could have given votes to a number of others.
What I liked most was that Judd, Murphy, Kreuzer, Betts, Gartlett, Gibbs and Scotland were all largely ineffective which shows what a great shut down job was done.
"You can quote me on this... He is gawn" - bomberdonnie re Hurley's contract status 25 February 2012
Re: Votes vs Scum
5. Stanton (another great all around game)
4. Watson (consistently great)
3. Crameri (could potentially of had the most damaging forward performance in the league if he kicked straight)
2. Hooker (oddly enough wasn't cringing when he got it today)
1. Hibberd (plays like a 200 gamer, very level headed. great down back)
Loved the fact our small forwards (Davey, Jetta, Dell) looked faster and more dangerous then theirs all day. Betts got 2 cheap ones from frees.
4. Watson (consistently great)
3. Crameri (could potentially of had the most damaging forward performance in the league if he kicked straight)
2. Hooker (oddly enough wasn't cringing when he got it today)
1. Hibberd (plays like a 200 gamer, very level headed. great down back)
Loved the fact our small forwards (Davey, Jetta, Dell) looked faster and more dangerous then theirs all day. Betts got 2 cheap ones from frees.
Re: Votes vs Scum
5. Brent Stanton
4. Jobe Watson
3. Stewart Crameri
2. Heath Hocking
1. Dustin Fletcher
This is the sort of effort that should be the benchmark for this list with exceptional hard work and team work =D>
Pats on the back to the other 17 players. Well done.
4. Jobe Watson
3. Stewart Crameri
2. Heath Hocking
1. Dustin Fletcher
This is the sort of effort that should be the benchmark for this list with exceptional hard work and team work =D>
Pats on the back to the other 17 players. Well done.
Essendunny
Re: Votes vs Scum
3. 5
2. 4
1. 22
Stanton would have at least 6 brownlow votes wouldn't he?
2. 4
1. 22
Stanton would have at least 6 brownlow votes wouldn't he?
Re: Votes vs Scum
Carlisle did well to get a vote. Must have played well in the stands....F111 wrote:3. 5
2. 4
1. 22
Stanton would have at least 6 brownlow votes wouldn't he?
Essendunny
Re: Votes vs Scum
5. Stanton
4. Crameri
3. Watson
2. Hibberd
1. Monfries
Fletcher, Howlett, Hooker, Davey also very good.
4. Crameri
3. Watson
2. Hibberd
1. Monfries
Fletcher, Howlett, Hooker, Davey also very good.
Re: Votes vs Scum
Drunk in ectasy tonight!BenDoolan wrote:Carlisle did well to get a vote. Must have played well in the stands....F111 wrote:3. 5
2. 4
1. 22 x 2 = TBC
Stanton would have at least 6 brownlow votes wouldn't he?
Re: Votes vs Scum
5. Watson
4. Stanton
3. Crameri
2. Hibberd
1. Bellchambers
4. Stanton
3. Crameri
2. Hibberd
1. Bellchambers
Re: Votes vs Scum
I thought Zaka was average. I had a very good view of him from the members balcony in the MCC. Jibbed a few contests, and his chasing was ordinary. He's good when he has the ball, needs to work on his defensive game.robbie67 wrote:5. Stanton
4. Belchambers
3. Heppell
2. Watson
1. Davey
Also good: Fletcher, Melksham, Pears, Hooker, Hocking, Ryder, Davey, Hibberd, Zaka, Crameri, Dyson.
Re: Votes vs Scum
THIS. Where has Zaka been this season? Pretty ordinary so farGimps wrote:I thought Zaka was average. I had a very good view of him from the members balcony in the MCC. Jibbed a few contests, and his chasing was ordinary. He's good when he has the ball, needs to work on his defensive game.robbie67 wrote:5. Stanton
4. Belchambers
3. Heppell
2. Watson
1. Davey
Also good: Fletcher, Melksham, Pears, Hooker, Hocking, Ryder, Davey, Hibberd, Zaka, Crameri, Dyson.
PS- gotta mention Dyson - he may not be great or a standout, but generally does his job. Was hoping he'd come into the team based on the shutdown job he did on Garlett last time.
Re: Votes vs Scum
5 - B.Stanton
4. J.Watson
3. M.Hibberd
2. S.Crameri
1. T. Bellchambers
4. J.Watson
3. M.Hibberd
2. S.Crameri
1. T. Bellchambers
- bomberdonnie
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 8575
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:25 pm
- Location: Old Hobart Town
Re: Votes vs Scum
I notice that Hocking hasn't received any votes ( myself included) fair chance that he would have gotten a few from the coaches??
Judd did nothing yesterday
Judd did nothing yesterday