forgotten? ben jolley?
forgotten? ben jolley?
is it just me in thinking this, or was this guy a little stiff.
Only saw a little bit of him at senior level, had a few decent touches(he was a rookie).
now delisted, and not picked up by our club or any other.
tough game footy, I would have thought he would have been given bit more of a go.
Only saw a little bit of him at senior level, had a few decent touches(he was a rookie).
now delisted, and not picked up by our club or any other.
tough game footy, I would have thought he would have been given bit more of a go.
I agree. What's more, I know a bit more about the bloke through a close mate of mine who actually lives around the corner from him. He has chatted to him on numerous occasions and he was desperate to stay and impress everyone at the club during the season. He is a quiet and shy sort of bloke who wants nothing more than to wear red & black. When given his opportunity, he aquitted himself very well I thought. What irks me, is that you see guys like Ty Zantuck come along and treat the place with utter contempt and disrespect, yet have had more of an opportunity than he.
imo i didn't rate him very highly, he didnt bring any attributes to the team and didnt have the look about him to make it at AFL level. He also lacked speed and versatility which i thought went against him.
but in saying this i do think that he wasn't given much of an oppertunity to prove himself and deserved more then he was given.
but in saying this i do think that he wasn't given much of an oppertunity to prove himself and deserved more then he was given.
- billyduckworth
- Club Captain
- Posts: 3053
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:16 am
- Location: Adelaide
- j-mac31
- Essendon Legend
- Posts: 15233
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:13 pm
- Location: The city of brotherly love (Detroit)
Should have been kept ahead of Peverill IMO. Jolley would have been a few years younger I think, which is an advantage, but I think he could have been a better player. Similar in that he can tag, and was also an awesome tackler and had better disposal than Pev.
Peverill wasn't out of contract was he? Jolley certainly should have been kept ahead of Winderlich.
Peverill wasn't out of contract was he? Jolley certainly should have been kept ahead of Winderlich.
No he shouldn't have, not when you consider the type of players we are lacking. Fast skillful midfielders, Winderlich could fufil that role. Jolley on the other hand was a tough at it in and under midfielder without great skills or speed....have enough of them on the list.j-mac wrote:Jolley certainly should have been kept ahead of Winderlich.
If we were to keep Jolley then it would've been Peverill to go, and axing Pev could've destroyed team morale.
While I liked Jolley, there was no way he was going to make it as a footballer, not in this modern game.
Whats surprising is that the officials saw this early, yet have persisted with players who clearly were never going to make it for a lot longer.
Whats surprising is that the officials saw this early, yet have persisted with players who clearly were never going to make it for a lot longer.
He kicks on the left
He kicks on the riiiiiiiiigggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhttttttttttttt
That boy Hurley
Makes Riewoldt look shite!
He kicks on the riiiiiiiiigggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhttttttttttttt
That boy Hurley
Makes Riewoldt look shite!