Jazz_84 wrote:The board simply can't sack Hird anymore, players are staying and coming to the club because of him, it wont happen now, Hirdy is entrenched more now then he ever has been
350 pages? and the players have to respond in 10 days? what a f****** joke ASADA is!
from what I've heard and read there is absolutely nothing to prove anything was taken, only weak possibilites... EFC better fight to the death on this
Can't see the AFL tribunal banning players on this evidence anyway, can't see ASADA appealing either
Hi J.
You must realise a lot of issues OUTSIDE here:
- Forget about Justice or Fair Play. It is all about face saving to 6TH rate idiots working in a 5th rate joint. Not you Carla.
- We are talking about a PS body here that has to justify its funding.
- However if its Politically important face saving, they will throw many $$$$ at it legally to save face...never mind no one was positive to a prohibited drug....we think you did....prove otherwise.
- Anyone can fill up 1200 pages of BS...especially a PS "Lawyer" ..... usually a C Pass loser (80% of Law Graduates do not practice Law) ..... just discuss the meaning of "the" in one sentence of one interview with anyone of 34 people.
And so it goes....this whole thing is a BS Shemozzle f**ked up "Mr Nice Guy" Evans: eg by releasing Ziggy's report.... Imagine BHP releasing a internal report? Wouldn't happen. Wish Little had been in charge from Day 1....he would have handled it differently....was handballed a cluster f**k.
Sick of the whole BS thing.
Finish it. The EFC will go on.
Payback is later.