The protected one

For all things non Essendon related, tell us how much you hate the Blues, Pies, etc.
Crazyman
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 7110
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: Sydney (Don't hold it against me)
Contact:

The protected one

Post by Crazyman »

Yep, one G.Ablett free to play.

Only A.Goodes got a better run at the tribunal.

User avatar
BenDoolan
Essendon Legend
Posts: 26146
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:10 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by BenDoolan »

Nothing in it. You could see him pulling his arm back to avoid contact. If he wanted to intentionally whack him, he would have.
Unfortunately, you can't drown a witch!

grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 8894
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by grassy1 »

Just got the news 10 minutes back on 504.

Sorry Ben,he’s Guilty to me.I would have given him a week for Intentional and reckless contact.

If there was no intention,what was his arm doing there in the 1st place?

I take it a player’s head isn’t that sacrosanct to the AFL now,if it wasn’t before.

So the precedent has been set.Reckon a few roughies will try it on now.And for that,they should get off,.......shouldn’t they? :-"

User avatar
BenDoolan
Essendon Legend
Posts: 26146
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:10 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by BenDoolan »

grassy1 wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 7:51 pm
Just got the news 10 minutes back on 504.

Sorry Ben,he’s Guilty to me.I would have given him a week for Intentional and reckless contact.

If there was no intention,what was his arm doing there in the 1st place?

I take it a player’s head isn’t that sacrosanct to the AFL now,if it wasn’t before.

So the precedent has been set.Reckon a few roughies will try it on now.And for that,they should get off,.......shouldn’t they? :-"
Do you want a non contact sport?

f****** people have gone soft as f***.
Unfortunately, you can't drown a witch!

grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 8894
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by grassy1 »

No I don’t.Call me cynical,but don’t you think the AFL play favourites here on certain players?

If someone else had done what Ablett had done,what then?Furthermore,if they did that to Ablett,what then?

2 weeks,with No chance of a reprieve for some battler? :roll:

It’s not so much the severity of the offence that shits Supporters,but the fact that high profile players on the mat,seem to get off Scottfree.

Crazyman
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 7110
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: Sydney (Don't hold it against me)
Contact:

Re: The protected one

Post by Crazyman »

BenDoolan wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 7:37 pm
Nothing in it. You could see him pulling his arm back to avoid contact. If he wanted to intentionally whack him, he would have.
Not saying there was much in it, but so much for head being sacrosanct...

Shiel has disposed of the ball and Gaz could’ve dropped his arm and bumped, same result on field, but unlikely to be reported.

Was clumsy and late at best, raised arm and no intention of tackling, IMO indicates it was deliberate...

User avatar
BenDoolan
Essendon Legend
Posts: 26146
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:10 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by BenDoolan »

Crazyman wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 9:13 pm
BenDoolan wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 7:37 pm
Nothing in it. You could see him pulling his arm back to avoid contact. If he wanted to intentionally whack him, he would have.
Not saying there was much in it, but so much for head being sacrosanct...

Shiel has disposed of the ball and Gaz could’ve dropped his arm and bumped, same result on field, but unlikely to be reported.

Was clumsy and late at best, raised arm and no intention of tackling, IMO indicates it was deliberate...
Different story if he didn’t get up etc.

I just think the game is insane if they’re looking to rub players out for that sort of thing.

Don’t worry, when one of our guys does it, he’ll cop weeks. I bet we won’t challenge it, and we will just have to wear it.
Unfortunately, you can't drown a witch!

User avatar
MH_Bomber
Club Captain
Posts: 3436
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:16 pm
Location: Hughesdale

Re: The protected one

Post by MH_Bomber »

See I HATE AFL FOOTBALL post. The Ablett let off this week is just one more reason I HATE AFL football!
Regards

MH_Bomber

User avatar
MH_Bomber
Club Captain
Posts: 3436
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:16 pm
Location: Hughesdale

Re: The protected one

Post by MH_Bomber »

Ablett does exactly the same high elbowing action again today against North and the AFL minions go in action and claim it should just a $2000 fine. In the same game the perfect shepherding bump is executed against Gary Rohan and because of accidental head clash the North player is looking at weeks.

The world of AFL has gone insane.

Holding the ball is simply not holding the ball, bumps are illegal, protected species like Ablett are looked after, the game looks like rugby union and I hate it.
Regards

MH_Bomber

grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 8894
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by grassy1 »

Wrestlemania Rules,MH.

AWFULL have their Good Guys,Bad Guys and Blind Eyes! :roll: #-o :-&

Crazyman
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 7110
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: Sydney (Don't hold it against me)
Contact:

Re: The protected one

Post by Crazyman »

He’s done pretty much the exact same thing again today...

What odds he now gets suspended and why the f*** wasn’t he last week 👿👿👿👿

grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 8894
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by grassy1 »

If he gets off,you have to wonder if anyone has a lot riding on an Ablett Brownlow Win?

For once with CERTAIN organisations,I really hope NOT!

nudder12
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:47 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by nudder12 »

And he's free again.
This week not even a case to answer.
Even though....last week MRO said that because he left the ground (jumped in the air) he HAD TO GRADE IT AS INTENTIONAL and offer a week ban. MRO said that is the guideline he has been given.

So, umm, what?? The guidelines have all been rewritten this week have they?
Surely, surely, surely......MRO was duty bound by his guidelines to give out the same decision this week, and it again be up to the tribunal to judge it if there was an appeal.
Refer to MH Bombers "I hate AFL" post.

User avatar
BenDoolan
Essendon Legend
Posts: 26146
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:10 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by BenDoolan »

nudder12 wrote:
Mon May 13, 2019 5:31 pm
And he's free again.
This week not even a case to answer.
Even though....last week MRO said that because he left the ground (jumped in the air) he HAD TO GRADE IT AS INTENTIONAL and offer a week ban. MRO said that is the guideline he has been given.

So, umm, what?? The guidelines have all been rewritten this week have they?
Surely, surely, surely......MRO was duty bound by his guidelines to give out the same decision this week, and it again be up to the tribunal to judge it if there was an appeal.
Refer to MH Bombers "I hate AFL" post.
What a ****** garbage institution the AFL is. Absolute f****** rubbish.
Unfortunately, you can't drown a witch!

grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 8894
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by grassy1 »

Surprise,surprise! :roll: :evil: :-&

Crazyman
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 7110
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: Sydney (Don't hold it against me)
Contact:

Re: The protected one

Post by Crazyman »

I hate to say I told you so...

Actually, no I don’t 🤪

grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 8894
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by grassy1 »

You told us so!

nudder12
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:47 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by nudder12 »

So now Rampe seeks to become the protected one....by no other than the AFLPA - who reckon his fine was too high, because.......it isn't consistent with other similar cases.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Where were you, AFLPA, when we needed commentary about consistency of applying the rules AGAINST Rampe???
Looks like their consistency is, umm, err, inconsistent! LOL

desmondo
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 1066
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:37 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by desmondo »

So Ablett doesn`t want to be known as a sniper??? maybe he should stop elbowing people in the head, that`s a start.

User avatar
BenDoolan
Essendon Legend
Posts: 26146
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:10 pm

Re: The protected one

Post by BenDoolan »

desmondo wrote:
Fri May 17, 2019 12:02 pm
So Ablett doesn`t want to be known as a sniper??? maybe he should stop elbowing people in the head, that`s a start.
As Sam Pang said last night on The Front Bar - “when it comes to champions, their elbows are sacrosanct”
Unfortunately, you can't drown a witch!

Post Reply